The SDSM party has accused Christian Mitkoski of failing to confirm the appointment of a secretary for good governance. According to the party’s claims, Mitkoski allegedly provided information suggesting he would vacate this specific role within the government structure. The SDSM further accused the government of potentially nominating a long-time business associate and an individual currently serving a conditional sentence in the context of the Toplek case.
These accusations were formally presented on July 4, 2026, at 13:28. During the exchange, a representative stated, “First, I will not say anywhere who will be in charge of the good governance. The question of whether we have a secretary who will be monitoring the implementation of the program of the government, will have a secretary who will be responsible for good governance, we will have.”
The core of the dispute centers on the confirmation of the role’s leadership.
The SDSM contends that Mitkoski’s statements were insufficient regarding the designated secretary for good governance. The party’s accusations suggest a broader concern regarding the composition of the government’s appointments, particularly in relation to the Toplek matter. The disagreement highlights a political dispute over cabinet appointments and oversight responsibilities within the government structure.
Topics: #accused #sdsm #not
