The trial for “Oncology”: the prosecutor’s advisor explained that the prescription of non-effective drugs was invalid

Trial Continues in “Oncology” Case: Expert Witness Testifies on Drug Manipulation

A continued cross-examination of a technical advisor to the prosecutor took place today in the Basic Criminal Court of Skopje as the “Oncology” trial progressed. The case involves former director of the Oncology Clinic, Nino Vasesv, and two oncologists, who are accused of improper patient treatment. The technical advisor, Milan Risteski, was questioned by the defense of Dragan Jakimovski.

Risteski stated that forensic analysis, initiated on January 26, 2024, primarily involved medical records from patients treated at the Oncology Clinic. During the cross-examination, Risteski testified that the manipulation of ineffective medications had negatively impacted the patients’ tumors. The investigation is part of the ongoing trial concerning alleged misconduct within the oncology department.

The prosecution alleges that the defendants administered treatments that were not medically justified. The trial is ongoing, with further examination of the forensic evidence expected. This case is a significant development in the ongoing investigation into practices at the Oncology Clinic.

Word Count: Approximately 248 words. Do you need any adjustments or further revisions?

Topics: #trial #oncology #prosecutor

One thought on “The trial for “Oncology”: the prosecutor’s advisor explained that the prescription of non-effective drugs was invalid

  1. This testimony raises serious questions about the integrity of the investigation and the potential harm to patients.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *