Disagreement has arisen between former prosecutors Lenče Ristoška and Nedan Savevski regarding the handling of a specific case identified as “Talir 2.” The core of the dispute involves the circumstances surrounding Ristoška’s departure from her duties concerning the subject matter. According to statements attributed to the former prosecutor Lenče Ristoška, the account presented by the former public prosecutor Nedan Savevski regarding her involvement was inaccurate. Savevski had suggested that Ristoška had abandoned her duties concerning the case prior to her official dismissal.
Ristoška refuted this assertion, clarifying that while she did take personal leave, she maintained that she intended to continue her work on the subject matter. Savevski countered this narrative by questioning the basis of Ristoška’s assignment to the case. He argued that the appointment of the subject to Ristoška—who was serving as a prosecutor within the main prosecution in Skopje—was improper because she was not the designated prosecutor responsible for that specific area of law.
Consequently, Savevski contended that since she lacked primary responsibility for the case, her departure could not be framed as a dereliction of duty leading to dismissal. The exchange highlights a professional disagreement over jurisdiction and accountability within the prosecutorial framework. The differing accounts from both the former prosecutor Ristoška and the former prosecutor Savevski underscore conflicting views on the procedural integrity and management of the “Talir 2” investigation.
Topics: #savevski #prosecutor #former
